Changes between Version 12 and Version 13 of CallForParticipation

Show
Ignore:
Timestamp:
2007/12/11 06:58:16 (9 years ago)
Author:
ktym
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • CallForParticipation

    v12 v13  
    1919From my experience as a developer of the !BioRuby library and the KEGG API service, I think there still are several problems to create integrated and interoperable environment: 
    2020 
    21 * How to integrate non-BioMOBY service providers for the future of life science? 
    22 * What kind of effort can be made for Open Bio* libraries (!BioPerl, !BioPython, !BioRuby, !BioJava) to be interoperable? 
    23 * What kind of problems and bottlenecks exist to develop bioinformatics workflows? 
    24 * Does every providers agree that the current BioMOBY implementation is the best solution to migrate? 
     21 * How to integrate non-BioMOBY service providers for the future of life science? 
     22 * What kind of effort can be made for Open Bio* libraries (!BioPerl, !BioPython, !BioRuby, !BioJava) to be interoperable? 
     23 * What kind of problems and bottlenecks exist to develop bioinformatics workflows? 
     24 * Does every providers agree that the current BioMOBY implementation is the best solution to migrate? 
    2525 
    2626So, in this opportunity, I hope to gather as many developers as we can, from major web service providers, from Bio* developers, from workflow client developers, and from the BioMOBY project, to discuss and develop a new Open Bio* standard for the web-service-centric bioinformatics-nation (TM).