| Version 6 (modified by alexg, 17 years ago) |
|---|
BioMOBY Workgroup
Understanding BioMOBY project
Presentation by Mark Wilkinson and others
- to make every web service providers understand what does the BioMOBY is
- current status of the BioMOBY project and how the sites integrated by BioMOBY works
- current status of the semantic MOBY and its practical usages or goals
Read the following article before the hackathon will be of your help
- Interoperability With Moby 1.0 – It’s Better Than Sharing Your Toothbrush!
- Preprint at Briefings in Bioinformatics http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/bbn003v1
Discussion Items
- What is the best solution for integration of the web services?
- Why BioMOBY uses the original XML format (BioMOBY triple) instead of SOAP's complexType?
- If only XML is exchanged among services, there is no need for SOAP. Should we start BioREST?
- Is there no redundancy in the current ontology of the BioMOBY objects and its inheritance?
- How to integrate arising new data structures such as pathways, metabolomics, and proteomics?
- Is there any performance bottleneck in the current system of the BioMOBY?
- Why BioMOBY uses the original XML format (BioMOBY triple) instead of SOAP's complexType?
- What kind of efforts have been made to popularize BioMOBY
- Why all web services are not compatible with BioMOBY yet?
- What is the strength of BioMOBY compared with non-BioMOBY web services?
- What kind of improvements can be made from now?
- Which languages can be used to create BioMOBY clients (only Perl and Java for now?)
- MOBYRubyClient
- Is there a need for refinemet of the current ontologies for data types and methods?
- Is it possible to implement BioMOBY client library in every Open Bio* projects?
- Is it a best way to utilize BioMOBY to integrate NCBI, EBI, KEGG, DDBJ etc. (or is it reasonable to create a proxy server which converts these services compatible with BioMOBY)?
- What kind of alternative approach have been made?
- EMBRACE
