Changes between Version 4 and Version 5 of LargeData

Timestamp:

2008/02/15 15:05:40 (17 years ago)

Author:

tmo

Comment:

--

LargeData

@@ -5 +5 @@
 Biomoby has proposed a mechanism to allow parts of the moby data to be referenced to achieve this in their framework. The reference types can be advertised in the moby central metadata registry and therefore made available to clients such as Taverna.
 
-We note that creating a service which accepts or creates references is not actually that hard - the hard part is to advertise this capability, specifically that technologies such as WSDL have no way to say 'this input has schema type XXX' when the input is a reference rather than a value.
+We note that creating a service which accepts or creates references is not actually that hard - the hard part is to advertise this capability, specifically that technologies such as WSDL have no way to say 'this input has schema type XXX' when the input is a reference rather than a value. The challenges that any system must solve to support reference passing are therefore :
 
+ 1. Allow input data to be passed to the service as a reference type.
+   a. Do this without breaking any existing typing system such as Moby data types, XML schema - this implies that the description of the service must seperate the transport and data content descriptions in some way. The service at a conceptual level consumes the data type independently of the transport type the service container uses to supply this.
+ 2. When the call to the service is made the service should allow the client to specify the delivery type for any results.
+   a. Delivery types can be specified as references - there are already systems out there such as the OGSA-DAI system that define a delivery block (such as 'put data on this ftp server and return a URL to it'
+   b. Some level of negotiation would be good - client requests a set of plausible references and the service negotiates one it can provide.
+   c. The default delivery would presumably be pass by value.
+ 3. Ideally a naive (non reference aware) client should be able to use the service exactly as it would without any of this work - this implies either back compatibility at the client API layer (Moby) or back compatibility in the description (i.e. WSDL)
+ 4. Allow some level of lifecycle management for results held in a delivery location
+   a. Allow the client to request specific characteristics i.e. 'hold this data for at least five minutes'
+   b. Generate policies based on authentication where present?
+